View Full Version : Painful;MMOItachi.
JuddDredd
04-20-2009, 12:51 AM
I have assumed the control the Painful one against the thread of MMOItachi. I will handle this conflict. Since the severity of the crime is low yet comprehensible.
This considers a misdemeanor of class B in the word of the abuse. The respect of member companions must be recognizes.
The people who are not quiting games have a right to play. This is a free country not a dictatorship. This will want the revision soon. If you have any thing to say please indicates me via a P.M. This is not a demonstration of law.
I AM THE LAW.
So please this is not a cirque show. Please be civil. If the following people can decide on a factor to behave themselves and drop charges. I'll consider a plea.
In the meantime i will decide an outcome my selves.:confused:
X-PLODE
04-20-2009, 02:19 AM
I have assumed the control the Painful one against the thread of MMOItachi. I will handle this conflict. Since the severity of the crime is low yet comprehensible.
This considers a misdemeanor of class B in the word of the abuse. The respect of member companions must be recognizes.
The people who are not quiting games have a right to play. This is a free country not a dictatorship. This will want the revision soon. If you have any thing to say please indicates me via a P.M. This is not a demonstration of law.
I AM THE LAW.
So please this is not a cirque show. Please be civil. If the following people can decide on a factor to behave themselves and drop charges. I'll consider a plea.
In the meantime i will decide an outcome my selves.:confused:
Now do it in Spanish.
painful
04-21-2009, 10:07 PM
The people who are not quiting games have a right to play. This is a free country not a dictatorship. This will want the revision soon. If you have any thing to say please indicates me via a P.M. This is not a demonstration of law.
that doesn't make any sense. in a "free country" each individual has a right to decide who plays in their game. A dictatorship means we can't tell others what to do, only ourselves.
By this logic,
I should be allowed to determine who plays in MY games, not anyone else.
People who are not quiting games don't have a "right" to play. People who host games can personally decide whether each person should be allowed in the game.
Spammer? Game ruiner? Feeder?
These are all reasons why someone should NOT be allowed to play. Someone who is noob, and/or who annoys the owner of the game does NOT have a right/
Furthermore, by your logic, privs would not be possible because any pub who joins has a "right" to play. No more saving slots for pubs either.
painful
04-22-2009, 02:21 AM
Also:
This has gone on long enough. I think its pretty clear that Painful and Itachi can't get along, and I'm gonna have to do something about it. I think the only solution is to remove one of you from the clan. I will check the facts and make a decision when I have time. In the meantime, just ignore each other.
No Dredds can rendure judgement other than nixon.
painful
04-22-2009, 02:22 AM
I have assumed the control the Painful one against the thread of MMOItachi. I will handle this conflict. Since the severity of the crime is low yet comprehensible.
This considers a misdemeanor of class B in the word of the abuse. The respect of member companions must be recognizes.
The people who are not quiting games have a right to play. This is a free country not a dictatorship. This will want the revision soon. If you have any thing to say please indicates me via a P.M. This is not a demonstration of law.
I AM THE LAW.
So please this is not a cirque show. Please be civil. If the following people can decide on a factor to behave themselves and drop charges. I'll consider a plea.
In the meantime i will decide an outcome my selves.:confused:
also,
please learn english.
thx
MMOItachi
04-22-2009, 02:37 AM
As odd as this sounds I dont know who you are.... Im a little curious as to how you acquired this position but i wont argue.... and i'm not asking for anyone to be banned.... I just want this feud to be over.... So if Painful can accept my apology for the past mess up by me i'm hoping we can get by this....
RichardNixon
04-22-2009, 02:52 AM
Sounds like they kissed and made up :)
My Opinion: Drop the case altogether.
painful
04-22-2009, 03:07 AM
Sounds like they kissed and made up :)
i resent this statement.
but "Case" can be dropped.
i also resent this judge dredd.
any dispute between two shamans should not be settled by someone who
1) isn't a higher position
2) can't form coherent sentences
MMOItachi
04-22-2009, 11:10 AM
haha i dont care about kissing and making up i just want a truce =D... glad we can drop this though.... and i kind of agree with painful on judd.... where did he come from!?!?
RichardNixon
04-22-2009, 01:08 PM
i resent this statement.
but "Case" can be dropped.
i also resent this judge dredd.
any dispute between two shamans should not be settled by someone who
1) isn't a higher position
2) can't form coherent sentences
How do you know that I'm not Judge Dredd? In fact, how do you know that Judge Dredd isn't more than one person? How do you know that Judge Dredd isn't intentionally feeding his words back and forth through translators so they come out garbled, making it impossible to tell who wrote it based on the way they normally write? :)
RichardNixon
04-22-2009, 02:40 PM
Also, you should read my post in the stickied thread. The purpose of Judge Dredd is to make the "judges" in these cases anonymous, protecting their reputations should their decision be controversial. Only I know who is masquerading as Judge Dredd in each case. The person (or persons) is chosen based on (1) the ability to be completely unbiased in their decision and (2) having good knowledge of the background and facts of the case. Think of it as a kind of anonymous jury duty. Keep in mind that I always have control of the process (and the final say on the judgment), but will almost always defer to the decision of Judge Dredd.
Zarkslife
04-22-2009, 05:05 PM
Secret Spoiler:::::::
JuggDred is a Naga:
http://judgemathistv.warnerbros.com/images/header.jpg
RichardNixon
04-22-2009, 05:13 PM
LOL that pic needs to be his signature.
EDIT: nvm, the happy black man with glasses doesn't really scare anyone...how about this
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/jhemp41/ScaryBlackDude.jpg
JUSTICE THAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE
painful
04-22-2009, 06:32 PM
Also, you should read my post in the stickied thread. The purpose of Judge Dredd is to make the "judges" in these cases anonymous, protecting their reputations should their decision be controversial. Only I know who is masquerading as Judge Dredd in each case. The person (or persons) is chosen based on (1) the ability to be completely unbiased in their decision and (2) having good knowledge of the background and facts of the case. Think of it as a kind of anonymous jury duty. Keep in mind that I always have control of the process (and the final say on the judgment), but will almost always defer to the decision of Judge Dredd.
jury duty?
does that mean everyone gets to be judge dredds or
is there a selected pool of the dredd from whom you choose from per case?
RichardNixon
04-22-2009, 07:46 PM
jury duty?
does that mean everyone gets to be judge dredds or
is there a selected pool of the dredd from whom you choose from per case?
Yes, I choose people based on what I said before.
JuddDredd
04-23-2009, 10:36 PM
Painful lacktherof formentioned on DEMOCRACY. This is not a dictatorship.
You are not hosting games.
But only using NIXON's/ELITE bot to host games FOR YOU. IF you believe you are allowed to let who you want to play based on you being host then perhaps you believe whatever else is subjective to you in point making all rules invalid that you see fit.
Do you go to friends homes they let you play their systems/ games/ etc. Then you decide that that no one else can play with you in that home because you don't want them to? Afterall the games/systems/etc does not berlong to you but berlongs to a master owner. They are merley letting you use it.
If you honestly beleive that whoever host has martial law on the matter of bans/kicks. It is surely mistaken. There is a set of rules that all parsons must follow.
IF YOU DONT LIKE SAID RULE. Then nothing stops you from hosting games the old fasion way, or perhaps start a new bot yourself. Then you can kick/ban/troll whoever you like.
Untill then...
This is testament of the NIXONS use of bot. It would be wise to acknowledge order of written law. Not make up your own. Or else chaos will ensue.
This is for yours and everyone else who uses the bot own good.
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.